3 ms·
I don’t think that’s how they’d view it at all. In their eyes it’s all these “spurious” lawsuits they’re protecting their client from within legal means. Arbitr
by 8ytecoder 4y ago
I don’t think that’s how they’d view it at all. In their eyes it’s all these “spurious” lawsuits they’re protecting their client from within legal means. Arbitration is expedient and much cheaper.
- Finnucane 4y agoIt's mainly about trying to close out the possibility of class-action lawsuits. They figure individual users won't sue for small claims. One on one you can't compete with their legal departments. Some companies have actually backed off on this strategy when someone figured out how to generate massive numbers of arbitration requests.