5 ms·
> Government issued bonds are the antithesis of high-risk, high-reward. That’s exactly what I said, that they need to come up with a higher-risk, higher-reward
by Tabular-Iceberg 4y ago
> Government issued bonds are the antithesis of high-risk, high-reward.
That’s exactly what I said, that they need to come up with a higher-risk, higher-reward instrument because bonds aren’t high risk, high reward enough to act as an incentive. Your problem clearly isn’t that the subject matter calls for insulting or dismissing, it’s that you decided in advance to act insulting and dismissive regardless of what the response may be.
The government makes the rules in the first place, I’m sure they can figure something out. At least I object to the claim that it’s obvious that they can’t.
- HWR_14 4y ago> said, that they need to come up with a higher-risk, higher-reward instrument Why bother doing that when they can give you money and you can invest it in lottery tickets, beanie babies, bonds or Google yourself? Except in the event of a startup, where you don't have the ability to buy in yourself to such a high-risk, high-reward outcome yourself. But there isn't be much difference between Google offering you RSUs and just more salary (assuming the 'more salary' also vested)