My impression is net neutrality is oriented for the end user to preserve fair content deliverability, not necessarily the content provider, with the primary goa

My impression is net neutrality is oriented for the end user to preserve fair content deliverability, not necessarily the content provider, with the primary goal to prevent throttling any or all content based on who is willing to pay for no or less throttling. This is not incompatible with cdn colo at an isp. Colo is not akin to providers paying to not be throttled, but more like having a data center very close to the isp, which like the colo would still be subject to physical rent costs.