> Do you have access to their internal modelling? I don't. I have no idea what they were expecting. This info is already out there [0] and they were laughably

> Do you have access to their internal modelling? I don't. I have no idea what they were expecting. This info is already out there [0] and they were laughably off the mark. They were expecting 2M subs this year and up to 18M in four years, according to McKinsey. It's funny watching people defending a dying brand. The broader context is that CNN and the rest of cable news has been self-immolating for awhile now and are circling the drain, desperate to remain relevant. [0] https://www.axios.com/cnn-plus-cuts-warner-brothers-discovery-1be0ac3a-6952-4af0-b8e2-03dd6ae0839c.html https://www.axios.com/cnn-plus-cuts-warner-brothers-discover...