3 ms·
which is why there should not have been a cnn+ to begin with. they couldnt offer the only service of theirs that people are paying for
by cupofpython 4y ago
which is why there should not have been a cnn+ to begin with. they couldnt offer the only service of theirs that people are paying for
- bombcar 4y agoExactly. It was doomed to fail and it sounds like everyone knew it (or they were hoping to make it into a life raft for when the cable companies collapsed).
- cupofpython 4y ago>they were hoping to make it into a life raft for when the cable companies collapsed interesting point. maybe there was some benefit to building the cnn+ infrastructure prior to their merger, and they did it because they figure they'll need it eventually
- ehvatum 4y agoThese people are not clever. Their calculations are apparent if you allow for sufficient sleaziness. CNN+ made sense back when Jeff Zucker was to be the man behind the throne of the Cuomo presidency. CNN+ would then have had the access to stay relevant as YouTube and Netflix ate up cable and satellite. Probably would have panned out if De Blasio hadn’t continuously sucked the oxygen out of the entire state for short-lived ego points. BLM was meant to be Cuomo’s road to the White House, not a city crosswalk, stupid bastard.