3 ms·
Nah, it's classic overreach. Until someones constitutional rights are violated, and it could take awhile, it will be the law of the land. The key part is the "r
by joshcryer 4y ago
Nah, it's classic overreach. Until someones constitutional rights are violated, and it could take awhile, it will be the law of the land. The key part is the "reasonable" search. Someone shoots someone in front of a store it's pretty "reasonable" for the cop to ask to see the footage. Some cop wants to see footage from a brawl that a store owner is involved in is maybe not reasonable, because it would both violate his 4th and 1st amendment rights. It is hard for me to see how this would get resolved in the courts on a 4th amendment basis, so it will take some time before it is knocked down. You have to have standing to take it to the courts and that requires a violation by the state. Anyone trying to bring this to the courts will get thrown out pretty quickly without being able to show that.
- patrick451 4y ago> Nah, it's classic overreach. Until someones constitutional rights are violated, and it could take awhile, it will be the law of the land. Violating people's constitutional rights needs to come with jail time. This should include anybody who votes these laws in, implements them through bureaucratic policy, or chooses to enforce them, from POTUS all the way down to the officer walking a beat.