3 ms·
It really is an issue that most backup providers do not offer a Linux client, I am also bound to S3 at the moment, I have been tempted to try out the windows cl
by madmaze 15y ago
It really is an issue that most backup providers do not offer a Linux client, I am also bound to S3 at the moment, I have been tempted to try out the windows clients in wine, but It would be great if someone would offer a good(cheap, reliable, non evil =D ) backup service with linux support, even if its just a commandline. Actually an API would be fantastic.. let the openSource community build you a client.
- dpark 15y agoTarsnap? I haven't used it personally, but the guy seems open and honest about the product. It's open-source and runs on Linux (but you have to compile).
- madmaze 15y agoyes ive looked at that, but its double the gb/month cost of S3 and S3 has no inbound traffic cost
- easp 15y agoSo, crashplan and backblaze don't work for you? The previous poster has a problem with them because he is running on an embedded Linux platform that has chosen to omit support for an useful system call from their kernel.
- vimalg2 15y agoSpiderOak does all of the above. Your data is encrypted end-to-end. https://spideroak.com/engineering_matters https://spideroak.com/engineering_matters They cannot peek. Also, my favourite feature: The client allows you to mirror the encrypted blocks to a remote FTP/SFTP target owned by you. There's your N+1. Talk about a zero-trust environment!