4 ms·
I think you are right emotionally speaking. A lot of people, author of blogpost included, started with clojure so now they might consider most lisps clojur'y(en
by roguas 4y ago
I think you are right emotionally speaking. A lot of people, author of blogpost included, started with clojure so now they might consider most lisps clojur'y(enough).
However, the broader lisp community writes code very differently from typical clojure. Different idioms, slight syntax variations, completely different tooling and ecosystems.
While I can agree with you that for 'us' it certainly feels emotionally true. But if you go into other lisps scheme, racket etc you would notice huge differences. Differences which may feel even stronger than java vs c++ diff.