> There’s nothing wrong with their definition of text document. I think we can agree that it could be more specific. Me and OP read "text document" and hear "p

> There’s nothing wrong with their definition of text document. I think we can agree that it could be more specific. Me and OP read "text document" and hear "plain-text file". The article talks about using Word. If someone sent me a Word document and called it a "text document" I'd look at them cross.