3 ms·
I think this is because Rhapsody is finally ready and they don’t want to have two conflicting pieces of software.
by mattl 5y ago
I think this is because Rhapsody is finally ready and they don’t want to have two conflicting pieces of software.
- steviedotboston 5y agoI heard the same thing. At last!
- runjake 5y agoMight you mean Copland? :) Rhapsody came and gone. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copland_(operating_system) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copland_(operating_system)
- mattl 5y agoNah, Apple has been working on Rhapsody in secret for the last twenty years in parallel with Mac OS X client.
- runjake 5y agoI’m not sure if this is a joke, but Rhapsody is long dead. It was the code name for early macOS, back when it was mostly a Mac OS-skinned OPENSTEP. We unwisely used it in production to host NetInfo and various other services.
- mattl 5y agoHow dare you! Rhapsody isn’t dead ;-) Avie is still blessing us all.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- smm11 5y agoYou took the words out of my mouth.