4 ms·
I would think (hope?) that if that were possible, the SEC et al would have sufficient awareness to do all due diligence possible to determine the provenance of
by exikyut 5y ago
I would think (hope?) that if that were possible, the SEC et al would have sufficient awareness to do all due diligence possible to determine the provenance of the agent in question.
Wait, what am I thinking. I don't need to worry about the SEC... the reputational boost associated with whoever identifies shady behavior first will be huge. Everyone will be bounty-hunting this to death backwards inside out and upside down. It's Twitter and it's umpty billion dollars.
- kjksf 5y agoSEC has no mandate (nor should it be interested in) enforcing rules created by Twitter board. SEC enforces laws created by congress. "Poison pill" is not a law. It's a rule created by Twitter board. It merely says "if this happens, we'll do that". If anything, SEC should be looking into Twitter's board authority to sell stock at half price, which clearly harms shareholders. And one of the things SEC is supposed to do is to protect shareholders from harm, even if the harm comes from inside the house.