4 ms·
Wouldn't that be a violation of his fiduciary duty, at least in the same way that other people in this conversation have defined fiduciary duty when criticizing
by rootusrootus 5y ago
Wouldn't that be a violation of his fiduciary duty, at least in the same way that other people in this conversation have defined fiduciary duty when criticizing the board for adopting the poison pill?
Bringing back the accounts that spew stuff which pushes advertisers away will not make Twitter more financially successful than they are today.
- xur17 5y agoIf he takes the company private, does he have a fiduciary duty to it?
- rootusrootus 5y agoThat's true, if his intent is to take it private, he could run it into the ground on purpose. Hell, maybe that's his intent. What if it turns out that rather than being a free speech absolutist, he thinks social media is destroying the world and the best way to solve that is to crush it out of existence, starting with Twitter. That wouldn't work, of course, but it would be entertaining.
- MrMan 5y agoDo his lenders enjoy him runni g the collateral into the ground?