3 ms·
> In the US, you can't sell as "new" anything that has even a single "used" part in it. Do you have a source to back up this claim?
by barbegal 4y ago
> In the US, you can't sell as "new" anything that has even a single "used" part in it.
Do you have a source to back up this claim?
- VLM 4y ago"citation needed" is an overused debating point that makes the opponent look better, regardless he's obviously talking about 16 CFR § 20.1 specifically subsection (a). Note that its trivial to work around. I purchased a bluetooth earpiece on Monday on amazon and its trivial to control-F around looking for the word "new". You will NOT find that word on any marketing. I don't believe any part of it is reused or recycled, however they're not dumb enough to use the word "new" in writing anywhere.
- antifa 4y ago> "citation needed" is an overused debating point That looked like a genuine request to me. Besides, some things really are questionable at a surface glance, but generally useful if and only if we know for sure they are factually true and the words used are precisely correct.
- mechanical_bear 4y agoGUIDES FOR THE REBUILT, RECONDITIONED AND OTHER USED AUTOMOBILE PARTS INDUSTRY So I looked it up and it’s not really universally relevant. This is why people ask for citations…