3 ms·
Probably much more banal than the article leads us to believe. Russia probably began jamming on <frequency x>, Starlink deployed a change to fail over the termi
by notpachet 5y ago
Probably much more banal than the article leads us to believe. Russia probably began jamming on <frequency x>, Starlink deployed a change to fail over the terminals to broadcast on <frequency y>. Would be my guess.
- Symmetry 5y agoProbably a bit more sophisticated than that involving patterns of frequency changing at certain intervals, but essentially.
- stefan_ 5y agoMy naive assumption was that since the Starlink terminals use phased arrays for beamforming, they were much less susceptible to brute force frequency jamming to begin with. Is there some truth to that?