3 ms·
Your viewpoint is valid but it's a philosophical argument, not a pragmatic one. I'm also not sure what you mean by 'stutter step'. I would posit that 95% of vi
by dbbk 5y ago
Your viewpoint is valid but it's a philosophical argument, not a pragmatic one.
I'm also not sure what you mean by 'stutter step'. I would posit that 95% of visitors never even notice hydration.
- nawgz 5y ago> Your viewpoint is valid but it's a philosophical argument, not a pragmatic one. I think not locking yourself to specific cloud architectures is quite pragmatic, but to each their own. > stutter step SSR advocates: parsing JS and interacting takes way too long, it's so noticeable and terrible! Me: so if you serve a pre-rendered-via-SSR page AND a bundle of interactivity, there's going to be a nice set of static content that will be uninteractable during that entire terribly long parsing and loading phase? SSR advocates: Never heard of such a thing, parsing JS and getting interactivity is instant!