> The FAA doesn't assume anything. That's why I'd love to read their analysis, they're very interesting. I'd have reasonable confidence in an FAA investigatio

> The FAA doesn't assume anything. That's why I'd love to read their analysis, they're very interesting. I'd have reasonable confidence in an FAA investigation. NYT however, I would be completely unsurprised to see them fabricating the existence of a FAA investigation entirely -- or them repeating the youtubers claim of an FAA investigation without ever checking. Googling for site:.gov "Trevor Jacob" (and the name reversed) turns up nothing but the aircraft registration.