3 ms·
> The FAA didn’t say that his violation was that he intentionally crashed a plane. the FAA did say he wore a parachute (unusual), opened the door before the en
by fsckboy 5y ago
> The FAA didn’t say that his violation was that he intentionally crashed a plane.
the FAA did say he wore a parachute (unusual), opened the door before the engine quit, didn't follow procedure to attempt to restart the engine, and intentionally climbed out of the plane to film it rather than attempting to land it.
- kube-system 5y agoYes he probably crashed the plane intentionally, but that’s not the regulation he broke.
- markus92 5y agoIntentionally crashing a plane seems a pretty good example of piloting in a careless/reckless manner that endangers life or property. There's not a specific rule "they shall not crash your plane" but this is more of a catch-all rule for these kind of situations.
- kube-system 5y agoThere's a big difference between forbidding "crashing a plane" and forbidding "recklessly endangering people and property". The most obvious example being: there are circumstances in which crashing is unavoidable. Sully, for instance, crashed a plane in a way that protected life and property. It is much more precise to just forbid "endangering people/property" than it is to try to enumerate every action that could be dangerous and then adding exceptions.
- fsckboy 5y agois there such a regulation? the part I'm quibbling about is, they do express that he showed intentions