3 ms·
"Reckless endangerment" doesn't necessarily have to have harm done to be a crime. The pilot could not have known with 100% certainty that the plane wouldn't la
by MerelyMortal 5y ago
"Reckless endangerment" doesn't necessarily have to have harm done to be a crime.
The pilot could not have known with 100% certainty that the plane wouldn't land on a hiker or wildlife.
- daniel-cussen 5y agoOh that makes sense. And it's an airplane, the ultimate sword of Damocles hanging over people's heads by a horse hair, yeah this was like a fucking kamikaze. And like the other commenters say, there are means to do aircraft destructions properly, with permission and so forth, meaning in that case with 0% chance of killing living things and therefore no felony.