> A larger standard library means more disk usage and worse cache utilization Does it? How? I suppose one has to store the standard library on the machine, whi

> A larger standard library means more disk usage and worse cache utilization Does it? How? I suppose one has to store the standard library on the machine, which does notionally use up disk space, but I can’t see how it contributes by any reasonable performance-relevant meaning of ‘disk usage’ (presumably i.e. disk I/O during the runtime of the program). And for cache utilization I simply have no clue at all what you might be driving at.