4 ms·
Unfortunately: > To be clear, it's OK to use Rust to implement YJIT (and other optional features in the future), but mainline CRuby will not be implemented in
by faitswulff 4y ago
Unfortunately:
> To be clear, it's OK to use Rust to implement YJIT (and other optional features in the future), but mainline CRuby will not be implemented in Rust.
- Matz, https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18481#note-14 https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18481#note-14
On the other hand, there is Artichoke Ruby: https://github.com/artichoke/artichoke https://github.com/artichoke/artichoke
- hardwaregeek 4y agoTrue, although Matz has changed his mind in the past (type annotations come to mind). I wouldn't be surprised if people notice that YJIT contributions are far more common, Matz may reconsider this.