5 ms·
Ask HN: Starting to get disillusioned and confused as a generalist
I don't know if this is just a phase or something, but it's starting to get to me.
Not too long ago I asked HN "I'm interested in so many disciplines, but what can I do with that?" [1], and got an overwhelming response (to which I still haven't gone through completely..!). It really got my brain going and got me out of my slump, and I'm more eager than ever to pursue this line of interest. However, more recently, I'm starting to get disillusioned and confused about the social aspects of being a generalist.
It's a bit confusing to explain (because it is confusing me): Before that Ask HN, I've only been pursuing these interests privately. Since then, I've met several like-minded individuals through HN and it's all very very exciting. But now my idealistic brain is starting to wonder, where else can I find more generalist intellectuals? Is there some community out there where we all gather around and discuss over-arching themes and ideas?
Up to this point, the only places I know with smart nerdy people are all highly specialized. For example, academic spaces for "real/published academics", subreddit for specific interests in philosophy or psychology, etc. There's no place where people with general interests gather, other than maybe clustering around particular individuals (eg substack newsletter followers).
I know there are many "learning communities", but those are not really what I'm looking for. (Maybe I'm arrogant but those feel very... uncritical...). The best place so far, is the HN crowd.
But, then, with HN, there's no good way to have sustained conversations on particular topics. And for most of the cross- or interdisciplinary problems that I can think of, there's a real need for sustained discussions.
Am I dreaming up something that doesn't exist? Are small clusters the best we have?
Or maybe (I think this is the "answer"), there are only networks of these people and interests groups, rather than one single centralized community. And because every individual generalist and every individual general interest group are characterized by a unique assemblage of interests, only networks can connect these people together. Am I on the right track here?
Come to think of it, spaces like academia isn't one big community either, but networks of individual researchers and research groups, each independently publishing their own line of inquiry. Did I just answer my own question..?
Sorry for the stream of confusion. I would love to know what you all think.
[1]:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30928105
- apolloartemis 4y agoHave you thought about participating in the effective altruism community? People in the E.A. community are kind and creative and love to talk about topics like philosophy (especially applied ethics), economics, A.I., animal welfare, space travel, and more. You could check out the E.A. Forum! https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/ https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/
- samh748 4y agoOh I've heard a bit about them. Looks like a cool place, will definitely look into it! Thanks!
- justcheckingin 4y agoHey Sam, hope I'm not overextending, wouldn't want to psychoanalyze someone that I don't know. Based on your post history, it seems like you're having hyperactive thoughts. Would you agree? Do you have access to a professional that you can talk to? Maybe friends, family, or coworkers around you can recommend someone if not? And goes without saying: please do continue posting to HN, I don't think anyone minds the posts.
- samh748 4y agoHey! I was kinda hoping no one would find out..! But yeah, thanks for caring. I really appreciate it. :) > And goes without saying: please do continue posting to HN, I don't think anyone minds the posts. Thank you for this reassurance. It's definitely one of my big worries. To be completely honest, I've been observing my own behaviour a lot and was wondering what to make of it all. I'm actually writing an essay about this right now (I write essays to process and make sense of my messy thoughts and feelings), but maybe I'll share some of it here: As you've noticed, I've got a lot of things running through my head most of the time. Usually it's relatively calm, but there are definitely times that I am almost entirely overwhelmed by mixtures of positive and negative thoughts and feelings. It's kinda weird that, I'm only starting to notice this anxiousness more this past year, after I came out of a pretty serious depressive episode. Prior to that I was basically numbed out for many years, like a low-lying depression if that's a thing. The thing is, for the entirety of my 30 years alive, I don't think I've ever felt like I had any real friends. I had "friends" from school etc, but none that I felt all that connected with. And certainly none of them were interested in the things I'm interested in. The only person I can talk to is my partner of 10 years; she's very supportive and smart and a great bouncing board for me. But there was always a void in me in terms of social life. Things changed entirely when I started participating on HN a month ago. All of a sudden, there were people willing to listen (to a certain extent of course), there were people talking to me, people who were respectful and honest and constructively critical and generous in sharing their goodwill. I don't think I've ever been this excited before (!!!!). But with that excitement, comes a shitload of anxiety, because now I'm really concerned with whether these amazing people will like me, and whether I am annoying them or putting them off in any way. Every Ask HN becomes an experiment, a data-point on how this place operates. And intellectually, each response I get spawns multiple directions of potential lines of inquiry, inspiring the next few posts. Repeat this for a few weeks, and this is where I am now, culminating with this specific Ask HN post. I'm really happy to be where I am now. I've met a handful of like-minded folks already, I've received amazing advice and short-term "mentorship" from a few, and my intellectual projects are finally moving forward. Realistically, I do need to start slowing down and calming down. Hopefully this particular post will smooth the transition. In terms of seeking help, it's not really something I want to do. I've seen doctors and was prescribed low-dose SSRIs, but I didn't take them, for fear of side-effects. I'm a stubborn one when it comes to these things; I really want to be able to deal with it myself. Not because I want to be all tough and independent, but because I genuinely believe in figuring out myself in a holistic way, to learn to work with my peculiar tendencies rather than against them. I'm at a much better place than I was a few years ago, knee deep in depression and unable to get anything done (story for another time). Now most things in life are relatively stable, and I'm hoping to continually move forward and improve my well-being. Crap that was long. Thanks for caring, again, and for reading this far (if anyone did).
- webmaven 4y agoYou've hit on why cross-disciplinary collaboration is difficult to foster (people either need to be pretty good at communicating with folks outside of their discipline, or they need to have an interest or discipline in common, but the people involved ideally need to have deep expertise that is not shared. So often you see pairs where each one's shared interest is the other's deep expertise, which happens a lot with pairs of fields that complement each other in an obvious way (eg. 3D imaging and archeology). Generalists shine when they bridge people who don't have much in common with each other. There are probably ideal ratios of "glue" people to have within a collaboration and within the groups from which collaborations arise, but I don't know what they may be, except at the low end (2-8 specialists need to have at least one generalist if there is nothing else bridging the gaps). Keep in mind that there are generalists and then there are generalists. Some people tend to have a wide array of interests and seemingly manage to be the second best at every one they pick up. Collaborations tend to form around them spontaneously and they are a specific subtype of the 10x practitioner. We can ignore their existence for purposes of this discussion. So, back to your question. Generalists connecting and working with other generalists fail the "deep expertise" requirement, which may not be a problem if there is a lot of low-hanging fruit to be found, but otherwise a concentration of generalists isn't particularly fruitful (except for social or recreational purposes, but we all like our groups to do double duty these days). You would think that a large group of generalists would at least be great for generalists to introduce other generalists into groups that would fit them, but it turns out that having a very small number of hyper-connected individuals (who don't even need to be generalists themselves, really) salted though the social graph serves that purpose more efficiently, as well as introducing people who don't need a bridge builder. My advice is that rather than trying to find or create a large group of generalists, you join a group that has a diverse, even eclectic set of people in it. Some interests tend to collect weirdos from all walks of life that tolerate each other's obsessions that they don't share, and you'll find that you always have something to talk about with everyone (even if it isn't the topic that the group is ostensibly organized around), and you'll also find more than the usual number of generalists or semi-generalists among them who were attracted to the group just like you were.
- samh748 4y agoThis is amazing stuff! Thanks for all the insights! > Generalists connecting and working with other generalists fail the "deep expertise" requirement, which may not be a problem if there is a lot of low-hanging fruit to be found, but otherwise a concentration of generalists isn't particularly fruitful That makes perfect sense. Once I started to imagine it more realistically, it became clearer that a big group of these people might not seem as constructive as I had thought. Really appreciate your suggestions. This is really helpful! Thanks again!!
- f0e4c2f7 4y agoIt's interesting you should bring this up I've recently been wondering about this as well. How do you find other people who just love to learn and master things. I agree that the best place I've found so far is hacker news, though it feels more that it just happens to be that way. I would love more spaces like this by the way. Many people seem actively hostile towards learning. Speaking of spaces if you have a local hacker space around that might be a good place to look.
- ffhhj 4y agoHey, I'm a generalist intellectual as well, and I contributed to one of your other posts: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31061563 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31061563 I have a project that could help, let me know if you are interested in participating.
- samh748 4y agoHey! I really enjoyed your insight in that other post! What's your project about? I'm not actually a hacker (imposter!) so I might not be able to contribute
- ffhhj 4y agoNo problem, I can do the coding, but it seems to me that you have great writing skills, and we are interested in solving related problems. This small thread could give you an idea of what I'm doing: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31045580 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31045580
- lurker137 4y agoIt sounds like a HN discord server would fit your needs. Maybe you could start one