3 ms·

You don't know what logic he used, only his conclusion. Perhaps the logic is: * If something is agreed to have a chance of extending my life for thousands of

You don't know what logic he used, only his conclusion. Perhaps the logic is: * If something is agreed to have a chance of extending my life for thousands of years by more than 5% of people whose thinking I respect and * it costs less than 200k and * there are no obvious people who are profiting from this then * I want to be >99% sure about it not being viable before giving up on it.

nknight 15y ago
He hasn't made that argument or anything close to it. The most he's said/implied is that $50/month is worth it. If he has some other logic, he'll need to share it if he hopes to convince anyone. Otherwise, he's just a guy standing on the sidewalk with a bottle of magic pills.
dpark 15y ago
Since religion promises eternal life, and a large number of respected scientists are religious, I assume that you are Christian, right? Also Muslim? And maybe Jewish?
- jpulgarin 15y ago
  What? I never said I used that logic.
  - dpark 15y ago
    Yeah, you did. If something is agreed to have a chance of extending my life for thousands of years by more than 5% of people whose thinking I respect and Check it costs less than 200k and Check there are no obvious people who are profiting from this then Check This is at least as true for religion (which you can practice for free) as it is for cryonics (which is a business venture). I want to be >99% sure about it not being viable before giving up on it. In what way can you be >99% sure that religion is not viable? What logic allows you to believe in cryonics but not religion, given that each have basically the same scientific underpinnings (which is to say, none at all). EDIT: Unless you meant that the logic you described was not yours, but just mmaro's, in which case fair enough.
    - nknight 15y ago
      The logic he described belonged to no one. Neither he nor mmaro actually claimed it. It was an entirely hypothetical scenario in which some people might see mmaro's statements as something other than selling snake oil (I certainly wouldn't, it still wouldn't amount to "evidence" of any sort, just more fuzzy hope).

nknight 15y ago

He hasn't made that argument or anything close to it. The most he's said/implied is that $50/month is worth it. If he has some other logic, he'll need to share it if he hopes to convince anyone. Otherwise, he's just a guy standing on the sidewalk with a bottle of magic pills.

dpark 15y ago

Since religion promises eternal life, and a large number of respected scientists are religious, I assume that you are Christian, right? Also Muslim? And maybe Jewish?

jpulgarin 15y ago
What? I never said I used that logic.
- dpark 15y ago
  Yeah, you did. If something is agreed to have a chance of extending my life for thousands of years by more than 5% of people whose thinking I respect and Check it costs less than 200k and Check there are no obvious people who are profiting from this then Check This is at least as true for religion (which you can practice for free) as it is for cryonics (which is a business venture). I want to be >99% sure about it not being viable before giving up on it. In what way can you be >99% sure that religion is not viable? What logic allows you to believe in cryonics but not religion, given that each have basically the same scientific underpinnings (which is to say, none at all). EDIT: Unless you meant that the logic you described was not yours, but just mmaro's, in which case fair enough.
  - nknight 15y ago
    The logic he described belonged to no one. Neither he nor mmaro actually claimed it. It was an entirely hypothetical scenario in which some people might see mmaro's statements as something other than selling snake oil (I certainly wouldn't, it still wouldn't amount to "evidence" of any sort, just more fuzzy hope).