I don't know. And further, I don't know how far US judges have extended it. Based on the article, the actions taken against him are a direct responce to his sp

I don't know. And further, I don't know how far US judges have extended it. Based on the article, the actions taken against him are a direct responce to his speech and his, stated, religions beliefs. And given that the courts sided with him, I am led to believe that this incident is on the "infringed free speech" side of the spectrum.