3 ms·
While the most prevalent narrative in threads like this sounds something like, "back in my day, we weren't so scared!", there's a few assumptions being made. Th
by jcutrell 4y ago
While the most prevalent narrative in threads like this sounds something like, "back in my day, we weren't so scared!", there's a few assumptions being made. The primary one: people are overestimating the risks associated with autonomy we had "back in the day" as kids.
It's also just as possible that we are adopting a lower tolerance for that risk, or that the risk is better clarified than it once was.
When I was growing up, I was allowed to roam the neighborhood. I lived on a military base in my youngest years, but later I lived in a suburb of a small town.
Nothing seriously bad ever happened to me, but that's anecdotal.
I wonder what is more likely: my parents were more risk tolerant, risk ignorant, or the world has become more dangerous. Both are possible, but I think the former two are broadly more likely than the latter.
- Barrin92 4y ago>my parents were more risk tolerant, risk ignorant, or the world has become more dangerous almost certainly not the latter given that a significant drop in crime since the 80s and 90s is an almost global phenomenon (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_drop https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_drop). Drunk driving fatalities are down 90% since the 80s despite miles travelled having doubled etc. I mean just remember the culture a few decades ago, people did not give a fuck about anything. People really have become comically anxious even though many places are considerably safer and cleaner. Maybe because of it.