4 ms·
If it becomes a market standard (due to ancillary revenues, reselling user data, etc), then the only choice consumers will have left are: (a) TV with ads or (b)
by rmellow 4y ago
If it becomes a market standard (due to ancillary revenues, reselling user data, etc), then the only choice consumers will have left are: (a) TV with ads or (b) no TV. "Voting with your wallet" has so many failure cases.
"That would never happen!"
Try buying a new car without touchscreen controls or software that controls the engine. It's still possible, but harder every year.
There is definitely a portion of the market that wants physical knobs, but one-size-fits-all is cheaper to make. Still, this seems like user segmentation that could present a commercial advantage, so I can't really explain this trend.
Related: Physical button on an Audi exists solely to upsell you on a software feature: https://www.thedrive.com/news/44967/audi-owner-finds-basic-hvac-function-paywalled-after-pressing-the-button-for-it https://www.thedrive.com/news/44967/audi-owner-finds-basic-h...
Welcome to the future.
- 6510 4y ago> choice consumers will have left are: (a) TV with ads or (b) no TV Like you can chose now between a smart TV or no TV?
- JohnHaugeland 4y agoDumb TVs are about $100 more. You can also use a computer monitor, or just do what I do, and never give the TV access to the internet
- rmellow 4y agoExactly. Thanks for the simpler example.