4 ms·

Please flag this account, this is AI generated nonsense.

mdp2021 5y ago
- CyberDildonics 5y ago
  This is not helping your case.
  - mdp2021 5y ago
    Explain yourself. I was, and am, very very serious. I spend time trying to produce quality posts, somebody comes, cannot grasp and calls this an AI?! That is a slur. Can you see how? Because, really - it's kind of costly and inadvisable to make the slur content explicit. I am all for the insult when proper - though you can read the quite controlled expression in these pages -, on the expressed condition that it is deserved. No issue when you call red what is red and pink what is pink. But when one has full legitimacy in a post, and somebody comes and states that that must be the product of a machine, that is first an insult, and secondly a very gross fault - the here writing "non-machine" has all the qualifications. The insult cannot pass, here: we'd like this place to be civilized. I expect that kind of approach to be censored with gravity, and I am surprised dang has not made an explicit note about it. I do fully expect any expression of such tendency to be corrected.
mdp2021 5y ago
I swear, the day in which AI remotely comes close to this one writing... We had conceived Turing tests to see when a machine starts becoming "adequate" in at least appearances, and now the public is that which cannot even make sense of very normal writing?! Everything upside down now?!
mdp2021 5y ago
In case you have not even understood the context, as I now suspect: a number of posts have been downvoted, flagged and hidden because "they were reminded of 'anus'" - or whatever. That's the «rattling motorbike». So the post was: "What you have to be reminded of is the following - not whatever coincidence suggests you. You think of a term, that's what you may think of, this is the realm in which you are supposed to think". Not clear? Language is there for you to understand, not to absorb. Otherwise, how can you grow higher than """AI""". You don't understand what is written (you call it «nonsense»), why it was written, and you do not get the suspect that the fumbling one is you?
- InitialLastName 5y ago
  I think I can see what you're getting at with your last post, but you might also want to work on the coherence of your written English. You are writing based on the spoken word, which doesn't lend itself to reader comprehension (in English). As an example: > You think of a term, that's what you may think of, this is the realm in which you are supposed to think. That's more of a series of phrases than a sentence, which is also a common characteristic of computer-generated text. All this is combined with the allusive nature of your posts, which will set off "conspiracy theorist troll" or "AI-generated" alarms everywhere it goes.
  - mdp2021 5y ago
    > You are writing based on the spoken word ... an example That is intentionally didascalic for the intentional expression of clarity, and it is enclosed in quotes, which do denote a switch. It intentionally describes a process in blocks. > your posts, which will set off My dear friend, do you realize that when something is labelled through «common characteristic[s]», that would be the shallow labelling that a machine does? And it is not even Bayesian, because important amounts of texts are written in a way similar to that in which I write - machine learning itself mocks human learning after all. "Maybe" it would be important in this time and age for information accessors to realize that either they put themselves seriously into understanding expressions - or, if they have to break a guinness world record of processed text per time unit (cpr.: "Spedread War and Peace, 'ts about Napoleon in the east"), the one serious approach is to then renounce actual judgement - do it properly or act consequently, knowing that you stopped before the threshold. After all, there are machines for preprocessing - and really they cannot but guess on normalspeak because they are stupid: if you are really intelligent, it's your job to use it (and a duty - "use it or lose it"). You should see even more the absurdity. Again - the point is very important: rushed prejudice-like labelling ("Cialis - spam") is not appropriate, it's machine-level, and a sign of decadence.
- Cipater 5y ago
  Are you writing your comments in a different language and then translating them before you post?

mdp2021 5y ago

CyberDildonics 5y ago
This is not helping your case.
- mdp2021 5y ago
  Explain yourself. I was, and am, very very serious. I spend time trying to produce quality posts, somebody comes, cannot grasp and calls this an AI?! That is a slur. Can you see how? Because, really - it's kind of costly and inadvisable to make the slur content explicit. I am all for the insult when proper - though you can read the quite controlled expression in these pages -, on the expressed condition that it is deserved. No issue when you call red what is red and pink what is pink. But when one has full legitimacy in a post, and somebody comes and states that that must be the product of a machine, that is first an insult, and secondly a very gross fault - the here writing "non-machine" has all the qualifications. The insult cannot pass, here: we'd like this place to be civilized. I expect that kind of approach to be censored with gravity, and I am surprised dang has not made an explicit note about it. I do fully expect any expression of such tendency to be corrected.

mdp2021 5y ago

I swear, the day in which AI remotely comes close to this one writing... We had conceived Turing tests to see when a machine starts becoming "adequate" in at least appearances, and now the public is that which cannot even make sense of very normal writing?! Everything upside down now?!

mdp2021 5y ago

In case you have not even understood the context, as I now suspect: a number of posts have been downvoted, flagged and hidden because "they were reminded of 'anus'" - or whatever. That's the «rattling motorbike». So the post was: "What you have to be reminded of is the following - not whatever coincidence suggests you. You think of a term, that's what you may think of, this is the realm in which you are supposed to think". Not clear? Language is there for you to understand, not to absorb. Otherwise, how can you grow higher than """AI""". You don't understand what is written (you call it «nonsense»), why it was written, and you do not get the suspect that the fumbling one is you?

InitialLastName 5y ago
I think I can see what you're getting at with your last post, but you might also want to work on the coherence of your written English. You are writing based on the spoken word, which doesn't lend itself to reader comprehension (in English). As an example: > You think of a term, that's what you may think of, this is the realm in which you are supposed to think. That's more of a series of phrases than a sentence, which is also a common characteristic of computer-generated text. All this is combined with the allusive nature of your posts, which will set off "conspiracy theorist troll" or "AI-generated" alarms everywhere it goes.
- mdp2021 5y ago
  > You are writing based on the spoken word ... an example That is intentionally didascalic for the intentional expression of clarity, and it is enclosed in quotes, which do denote a switch. It intentionally describes a process in blocks. > your posts, which will set off My dear friend, do you realize that when something is labelled through «common characteristic[s]», that would be the shallow labelling that a machine does? And it is not even Bayesian, because important amounts of texts are written in a way similar to that in which I write - machine learning itself mocks human learning after all. "Maybe" it would be important in this time and age for information accessors to realize that either they put themselves seriously into understanding expressions - or, if they have to break a guinness world record of processed text per time unit (cpr.: "Spedread War and Peace, 'ts about Napoleon in the east"), the one serious approach is to then renounce actual judgement - do it properly or act consequently, knowing that you stopped before the threshold. After all, there are machines for preprocessing - and really they cannot but guess on normalspeak because they are stupid: if you are really intelligent, it's your job to use it (and a duty - "use it or lose it"). You should see even more the absurdity. Again - the point is very important: rushed prejudice-like labelling ("Cialis - spam") is not appropriate, it's machine-level, and a sign of decadence.
Cipater 5y ago
Are you writing your comments in a different language and then translating them before you post?