4 ms·
It's not clear your logic actually follows, presumably some fraction of those 100M would pay if sharing passwords wasn't an option.
by hhmc 4y ago
It's not clear your logic actually follows, presumably some fraction of those 100M would pay if sharing passwords wasn't an option.
- foepys 4y agoBut how many people will stop paying because they only keep it for their parents, partners, or friends? This could easily result in less subscribers. If Netflix were so sure about the benefits of blocking password sharing, they could've done this years ago. Arguably many people subscribe to the comparatively very expensive UHD plan because they can share passwords with up to 3 people.
- bluehatbrit 4y agoI imagine you're probably right but I don't think it'll be the case for me. I upgraded because my parents and in-laws were using it on occation so I needed more concurrent streams on my package. If they crack down, I'll downgrade immediately and I doubt my parents and in-laws would want to start paying for it, they only use it on rare occasations it just so happens that tended to cross over with me and my wife who are heavy users. I think they'd probably get a net loss from me and my family if they cracked down.