4 ms·
The article says "former" twitter employee, not current.
by pkd 4y ago
The article says "former" twitter employee, not current.
- newswasboring 4y agoIsn't that worse? Even the current employees shouldn't have access to this information. Let alone former ones.
- function_seven 4y agoHow does that improve or change things? Not a rhetorical question; I’m confused by the vagueness in the article. Was the employee current at the time of info sharing, and is now “former”? Or did they retain access to systems after leaving the company? Or did they pass info from a friend still working at twitter? In any of these cases it’s still troubling.