Zero trust is indeed not a good way to define it, rather a marketing pitch. Ultimately you'd have to trust someone even that reduced to one, do you even trust

Zero trust is indeed not a good way to define it, rather a marketing pitch. Ultimately you'd have to trust someone even that reduced to one, do you even trust yourself? It's infeasible to implement something that's absolutely based on trust none. The so called "Zero trust" is merely escalated restriction but still "as need basis".