> * physically closer > How can this be guaranteed? You have no control over the closest Edge function vs Cloud Server to the user. Because the user doesn't g

> * physically closer > How can this be guaranteed? You have no control over the closest Edge function vs Cloud Server to the user. Because the user doesn't get to talk directly to the database. The database could be on the second floor of the user's building, but it's still going to have to get routed via an API. If you're using serverless functions for your API (presumably so, given this conversation), you still have the multi-hop issue to fetch data from the db. And in the case of a complex BI dashboard with multiple data sources, the extra hops can add up significantly. > Again, your Edge function seems likely to either be cold or busy, so this is only something you can speak about probabilistically A true Edge function has nearly 0ms latency to spin up from cold. They are distinguished from Lambda functions, which would alternatively be running in a data-center colocated with your database in most cases. Lambda functions do have a small cold start issue. But whether you're using Lambdas or Edge functions or Node.js containers, this doesn't affect the core issue. > HTML still needs to render a DOM, not sure you're hitting on the right points of the parsing... Plus if this page is meant to be interactive still, you've not gained anything with the initial SSR phase The HTML has to load into memory and only when it hits the JS script that actually triggers the XHR request does the call out for data occur. Depending on how your JS is bundled with your static HTML, those XHR requests may fire off at sub-optimal times. That is not something just automatically handled. It's something you have to consciously optimize for. > It's just not a big deal, and it's laughable you'd make the example a BI dashboard because you rendered something nice for them initially in maybe 0.5s faster on a median request, in exchange for literally enormous complexity. But a BI user is probably going to be in there for a long time, interacting heavily with client-side JS you shipped and they had to parse and render and then also reconcile/hydrate It's not laughable. A BI dashboard is an excellent use case for SSR, because it has multiple independent components that draw data from multiple API endpoints. This is precisely where SSR shines. Not sure why you're laughing. It almost sounds like you're being cognitively dissonant in the face of a practical example that conflicts with your thesis. SSR is not complex with a framework like Next.js. It's incredibly simple. It also trivially toggles between static or server rendering depending on that particular page's data access pattern. > How is this easier to satisfy on SSR? You have minimal advantage on your Edge worker being closer to your database than the user, unless your Edge function is actually just sitting beside your database server. It has to make the same requests and transfer the same data the client would be transferring in order to perform this SSR, there are only savings here if your Cloud provider is offering you big vendor lock-in promotions. Multiple database hits? Simple, if you have a page with 10 components that draw from different API routes / endpoints, instead of waiting for each of those components to load into memory on the client-side with janky placeholder data while it runs 10 HTTP requests (unless you've taken on the complexity of rolling up component requests to the top level, which can be difficult if for example, the dashboard is customizable in some way from user to user). Firstly, Edge functions aren't a prereq for SSR. You can totally deploy a Node.js container in a particular data center right alongside the DB instance if you need. Secondly, you also have access to numerous caching solutions if you really need to keep data hot. Thirdly, if you're using Edge for SSR, you're presumably already using Edge for your API. Fourth, if you really want to have data located near your edge functions, you can achieve this too! See: https://blog.cloudflare.com/workers-kv-is-ga/ https://blog.cloudflare.com/workers-kv-is-ga/ > Cloudflare loss-leader pricing > Unconvincing. I don't know what to tell you. AWS Lambdas are $0.20 per 1M requests: https://aws.amazon.com/lambda/pricing/ https://aws.amazon.com/lambda/pricing/ and they've been around for 6 years. At any rate, I also suggest looking at the direction that Next.js + React is going in: https://calibreapp.com/blog/nextjs-performance https://calibreapp.com/blog/nextjs-performance "With Server Components, you’re able to opt-in which parts of your application are rendered on the server and when client-side code is required. In Next.js, a server component will be denoted by filename, e.g., page-name.server.js, whereas a client-side component will use page-name.client.js. In the following example, we can fetch content from a CMS, import a date-time utility (date-fn) and render markdown. The resulting client-side JavaScript from this page will only include the ShareMenu, which is dynamically loaded. React will resolve <Suspense> boundaries client-side." So the direction it's heading, you'll get the best of both worlds.