This formulation presents a host of federal (and state) constitutional problems (i.e., contracts clause, takings, equal protection, etc.). You're certainly rig

This formulation presents a host of federal (and state) constitutional problems (i.e., contracts clause, takings, equal protection, etc.). You're certainly right that California "can" specify this. California would not be able to successfully defend this type of law in court. Pedantically, I guess you're right in the same way that you can "sue" anyone for anything, provided "sue" doesn't mean "win the lawsuit."