> So "most kids don't need to go to college" seems historically shortsighted. High school was proven important (if we just take that part of your argument as a

> So "most kids don't need to go to college" seems historically shortsighted. High school was proven important (if we just take that part of your argument as a given), so therefor college must be? By that reasoning, I don't see what makes the highschool cutoff "shortsighted" and the college cutoff correct. Why not four more years for a postgraduate degree?