3 ms·
Who cares if the evidence is / was weak? They were censored for misinformation not because the evidence is weak. By that logic your post should be censored sinc
by _-david-_ 5y ago
Who cares if the evidence is / was weak? They were censored for misinformation not because the evidence is weak. By that logic your post should be censored since your evidence that it was censored for being weak is in fact weak evidence.
We are not talking about the head of the FBI. If the head of the CDC said something like this you may be have a better comparison. Even if the CDC said something like this it wouldn't impact health so it probably shouldn't even count as harmful content.
- alphabettsy 5y agoWho was censored regarding the lab leak theory?
- _-david-_ 5y agoDr. Li-Meng Yan
- alphabettsy 5y agoHow?
- _-david-_ 5y agoShe was banned on Twitter. I think it was temporary and she has her account back now though. Facebook explicitly banned the theory and later unbanned the theory. YouTube demonetized some videos about the theory, but I am not sure what the current status is. Pretty clear censorship on Twitter and other social media sites.