4 ms·
That's not the point, the point is that Firefox still gives you the choice, while Chrome devs don't think you should have a choice.
by fletchowns 15y ago
That's not the point, the point is that Firefox still gives you the choice, while Chrome devs don't think you should have a choice.
- redthrowaway 15y agoChrome's FOSS, but it's not driven by the FOSS mentality like FF is. Choice is great, but when it interferes with UX one or the other has to go. Google is a consumer app company, so they went with simplicity and a clean interface. That's their right. We aren't living in the MS EEE days anymore. You always have the choice to use a different browser. Hell, if you care that much, you can download the source, re-enable the http:// http:// display, and compile it yourself. I really fail to see the problem, here. Your complaint is that there's no practical difference whatsoever, but that you want to have the choice. That seems to be a pretty minor thing to be kvetching about.
- fletchowns 15y agoI didn't make any comment or complaint about the practical difference...
- zobzu 15y agowhats funny is you got downvotedand his hateful, not so relevant comment like go compile it us upvoted. figures !
- redthrowaway 15y agoIn what sense was my comment hateful? Insensitive, perhaps even impolite, sure. But hateful?