4 ms·
This Johan Anderberg is a complete crank. He spent much of the pandemic with state epidemiologist Anders Tegnell and his predecessor Johan Giesecke, who gave hi
by bjornsing 5y ago
This Johan Anderberg is a complete crank. He spent much of the pandemic with state epidemiologist Anders Tegnell and his predecessor Johan Giesecke, who gave him access so that he could write a book. It’s some kind of weird bromance between the three of them.
Fact is that Johan Giesecke was completely wrong about almost every epidemiologically important property of SARS-CoV-2. I documented his delusions here already in April 2020: http://www.openias.org/swedens-covid19-strategy http://www.openias.org/swedens-covid19-strategy
- rurban 5y agoYou are equally wrong on your rant. The 90% asymptotic figure was long established, and still is true.
- bjornsing 5y agoBullshit. “By analyzing over 350 studies, we estimate that the percentage of infections that never developed clinical symptoms, and thus were truly asymptomatic, was 35.1% (95% CI: 30.7 to 39.9%).” (1) Anders Tegnell claimed on 2020-03-26 that 95-97% “will hardly notice their decease” (2). 1. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2109229118 https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2109229118 2. https://twitter.com/karimjebari/status/1243623795253968902?s=21&t=j29sv3z0z-p4h7lW6h9T4w https://twitter.com/karimjebari/status/1243623795253968902?s...