I'll give the positive side of it. I'm sure there's enough negatives too. I find it to be more transparent in many ways. It's clearer which writer is getting p

I'll give the positive side of it. I'm sure there's enough negatives too. I find it to be more transparent in many ways. It's clearer which writer is getting paid for what. On many news sites, you don't know if the money is going to the company and which writer is getting compensated. The focus is to pay writers you like to write more, and is not centered on the writing that gets enough payment from advertisers. You also don't get much in terms of ads from the writers too. You know what your paying for, what you're getting, and from whom. You know that what you are reading will stay available to you because it is in your email, which cannot be paywalled or taken off the internet because something happened to the business model or to the website. You own the right to read the content you paid to get, and it will always be available as long as you have your emails saved and accessible.