3 ms·

I don't understand your point. The lab-leak theory is richly covered in the press and in my Facebook activities. A certainty that the lab-leak theory is true

I don't understand your point. The lab-leak theory is richly covered in the press and in my Facebook activities. A certainty that the lab-leak theory is true is the fake news. It is far from true. It is merely a theory whose odds become longer by the month.

incomingpain 4y ago
>The lab-leak theory is richly covered in the press and in my Facebook activities. You mean the lab-leak conspiracy theory. https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2021/06/03/the-wuhan-lab-leak-hypothesis-is-a-conspiracy-theory-not-science/?sh=77709746dd8c https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2021/06/03/the-... Twitter bans you if you bring up the lab leak conspiracy theory. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/twitter-bans-zero-hedge-coronavirus-conspiracy-theory/ https://www.cbsnews.com/news/twitter-bans-zero-hedge-coronav... >A certainty that the lab-leak theory is true is the fake news. It is far from true. It is merely a theory whose odds become longer by the month. Sorry, my mistake. Not conspiracy theory. It's fake news. Look at this fake news publication 'the nypost' aren't the same same ones who published fake news about a hunter biden laptop? https://nypost.com/2021/05/19/lab-leak-theory-no-longer-fake-news-and-other-commentary/ https://nypost.com/2021/05/19/lab-leak-theory-no-longer-fake... I guess that your 'rich coverage' is explaining how this conspiracy theory... sorry... fake news is so wrong?
- AuthorizedCust 4y ago
  Your example of a Twitter ban is from 26 months ago and is over a conspiracy theory, written up in a publication known for being a prolific source of fake news, about a specific scientist. That was and still is false. The original argument put differently: -lab-leak theory <- not fake news; it is a theory and circulates among other theories of COVID's origin -lab-leak theory is true <- fake news; not only is it far from proven, its odds get worse each month as we find out more

incomingpain 4y ago

>The lab-leak theory is richly covered in the press and in my Facebook activities. You mean the lab-leak conspiracy theory. https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2021/06/03/the-wuhan-lab-leak-hypothesis-is-a-conspiracy-theory-not-science/?sh=77709746dd8c https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2021/06/03/the-... Twitter bans you if you bring up the lab leak conspiracy theory. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/twitter-bans-zero-hedge-coronavirus-conspiracy-theory/ https://www.cbsnews.com/news/twitter-bans-zero-hedge-coronav... >A certainty that the lab-leak theory is true is the fake news. It is far from true. It is merely a theory whose odds become longer by the month. Sorry, my mistake. Not conspiracy theory. It's fake news. Look at this fake news publication 'the nypost' aren't the same same ones who published fake news about a hunter biden laptop? https://nypost.com/2021/05/19/lab-leak-theory-no-longer-fake-news-and-other-commentary/ https://nypost.com/2021/05/19/lab-leak-theory-no-longer-fake... I guess that your 'rich coverage' is explaining how this conspiracy theory... sorry... fake news is so wrong?

AuthorizedCust 4y ago
Your example of a Twitter ban is from 26 months ago and is over a conspiracy theory, written up in a publication known for being a prolific source of fake news, about a specific scientist. That was and still is false. The original argument put differently: -lab-leak theory <- not fake news; it is a theory and circulates among other theories of COVID's origin -lab-leak theory is true <- fake news; not only is it far from proven, its odds get worse each month as we find out more