3 ms·
So this is an interesting distinction. Isn't "free speech" much easier to support if your platform is zero/minimal discovery to it? I.e. if you actively are sea
by mbesto 5y ago
So this is an interesting distinction. Isn't "free speech" much easier to support if your platform is zero/minimal discovery to it? I.e. if you actively are searching for <insert taboo topic> and subscribe to it, you're actively signaling your choice. Whereas, YT, Twitter, etc. content gets throw at you whether you like it or not.
- misiti3780 5y agoi think it is much easier for substack because of this.
- naoqj 5y agoTwitter wasn't like that. In the beginning you only received content you subscribed to. But they decided to change that.
- dasil003 5y agoWait, what? Twitter is still primarily (other than ads) content from people you follow, the main change is screwing around with non-chronological order. Unless you are talking about the Trending sidebar or something?
- naoqj 5y agoWhen I use it I get in my timeline popular tweets from accounts that I don't follow and likes given by people who I follow (these are not retweets). I shouldn't see either.