4 ms·
more like 'california considers codifying that which is already known' many of the largest employers like amazon, walmart, and fast food already restrict their
by nimbius 5y ago
more like 'california considers codifying that which is already known'
many of the largest employers like amazon, walmart, and fast food already restrict their employees to <40hrs to conspicuously avoid paying any benefits to employees. salaried employees wouldnt be affected by definition.
what good does this serve? i guess it squeezes reprehensible companies by forcing them to pay healthcare/benefits, but the reality is likely that companies will just further divide and conquer the employees workday.
- mywittyname 5y ago> but the reality is likely that companies will just further divide and conquer the employees workday. This is a separate, but important issue that warrants its own laws.
- dragonwriter 5y ago> many of the largest employers like amazon, walmart, and fast food already restrict their employees to <40hrs to conspicuously avoid paying any benefits to employees 40 hours or 8 hours per day is the current general overtime threshold; 30 hours is the current general full-time threshold for benefit mandates. This bill would lower the 40 hour limit to 32.