4 ms·
The French data privacy regulator asked a public body to not use ReCAPTCHA
- ls15 5y agoIf a public service cannot be used without sending requests to a private third party, they are clearly doing it wrong.
- titaniumtown 5y agowell put!
- sylware 5y agoReCAPTCHA does not work with noscript/basic (x)html browsers, then it is a definitive nono.
- FrenchDevRemote 5y agoIt's literally impossible to detect any kind of decent bots without JS, so it's absolutely necessary
- sylware 5y agothat cure is worse than the disease.
- FrenchDevRemote 5y agoyeah no. The disease is: -24/7 credential stuffing on all the accounts of everyone, everywhere -99% of spam content on 100% of the websites you visit -websites down all the time because of DDOS -10-100X hosting costs for sites because of bad bots The problem is not JS, but what they do with JS.
- atoav 5y agoI have a single question on a blog contact page for roughly 5 years now, that can be answered with a google query and is extremely permissive about how you write the answer. I have not received a single spam message on that email address as of now (quite a few actual comments tho). Granted: people who don't manage to put in the time to answer the question are not people who I am interested in — a stance which a government website cannot afford — but there are ways to solve this sufficiently without Recaptcha. If your forms are juicy goals for targeted attacks this might be a different matter, but how about just paying a bunch of devs to program it for your state and open-source it?
- FrenchDevRemote 5y agoWell exactly, you're a low value target, a 0$ value target, a bad actor would actually loose money by trying to spam you, so of course no one even tried, but you could be spammed to death in less than a hour of work >If your forms are juicy goals for targeted attacks this might be a different matter, but how about just paying a bunch of devs to program it for your state and open-source it? Because it's a really hard problem and it would cost a lot of money while probably not even being really effective, and reducing your revenue at the same time because your UX is probably a lot more terrible than the existing solutions? +BTW the captcha in recaptcha is not even the main value of this service, the main value is the bot detection algorithms that run before/during/after the captcha, which gives you a "human/bot" score before you even filled the captcha Good luck reproducing that in every company that needs it. It would cost a ton of money with really lame results most of the time
- atoav 5y agoAs I said: I am not a juicy target. Yet I see other non-juicy targets deploy captchas like there would be no other way. My issue with this is: Every public government website on earth is going to have this problem. The obvious solution is that governments invest public money into solving the problem resulting in public code. Sure a way has to be found how governments can build and maintain digital infrastrucure, maybe on a state level, maybe on a multinational level, beyond just a one-off thing.