If nothing else, this goes to show that headlines are meant only to catch your eye and not be a primary source of info in and of themselves. It's an issue in ge

If nothing else, this goes to show that headlines are meant only to catch your eye and not be a primary source of info in and of themselves. It's an issue in general, where people think headlines are meant to condense the article as a one-line summary, that's simply not true. I think the use of synecdoche here is reasonable. The publication matters, too. If the researchers were in England, the title would certainly be different. If the researchers were in Brazil, it would likely be similar.