3 ms·
> The author says he spoke with at least 30 natives there who may have seen them. A very small population of secretive homininins would fit that bill. Lets do
by robinsoh 4y ago
> The author says he spoke with at least 30 natives there who may have seen them. A very small population of secretive homininins would fit that bill.
Lets do a thought experiment. If I went to CT and talked to 100 dudes in various bars, do you think I could get 30 of them to say they had seen bigfoot in their area?
Authors and journalists citing stuff like "30 natives" makes me uncomfortable.
In August 1895 Connecticut, a journalist with an imagination and a predilection for hoaxes named Lou Stone invented a story about a "wild man" who appeared to Town Selectman Riley Smith. The story spread like fire, appearing in newspapers all over the country and further igniting the imagination of the locals, who reported their own sightings of the Wild Man.
Residents attempted to explain the Wild Man, claiming it was actually not an unknown beast, but perhaps a gorilla, or an escaped mental patient. In many sightings, villagers swore to have seen details. Mrs. Culver describes a "savage face, almost brute in expression."
Eventually, the reporter admitted the truth: he just wanted to sell papers. And indeed he sold papers, and tourism, and put Winsted, Connecticut on the map.
- kuhewa 4y agoYeah I commented elsewhere, if 30 eyewitnesses to mythical little folk (from an island with pop: 2 million) is good enough evidence of their existence, keep the author away from Tasmania, where he could probably find 1000 people that have seen an extinct Thylacine.
- bayesian_horse 4y agoThe difference here is not the conclusive weight of the positive evidence, but rather the lack of conclusive negative evidence. To me the possibility there still may be extant H. floresiensis around is very miniscule, but not entirely zero. Especially the possibility that they survived a bit longer than previously thought is not completely unlikely.