3 ms·
You could probably find thirty people who say they have seen leprechauns, which are also hominids. Most people would not consider this to be serious evidence.
by _tom_ 4y ago
You could probably find thirty people who say they have seen leprechauns, which are also hominids.
Most people would not consider this to be serious evidence.
- bayesian_horse 4y agoExtraordinary claims need extraordinary evidence. Extant Hominids are somewhat more likely than real leprechauns... The existence of those eyewitness accounts is not positive evidence, but rather constitutes a lack of negative evidence. If tens of thousands of people going through those forests all said "nothing there", then that would be negative evidence.