The disconnect for me is that I while I agree a lot with this line of reasoning: that is, that private risk taking and entrepreneurship generally is a net good.

The disconnect for me is that I while I agree a lot with this line of reasoning: that is, that private risk taking and entrepreneurship generally is a net good. However, I don’t agree that it necessarily follows from there that such a system falls apart completely if we limit what founders are able to do in perpetuity. Do you really believe that once you’ve made one thing at one point in time, you should be entitled to everything that follows from it, no matter the effect your subsequent a actually have?