> They host but don’t control content via e.g. editorial policy, ideology or private interests. They absolutely do control content, by banning content that vio

> They host but don’t control content via e.g. editorial policy, ideology or private interests. They absolutely do control content, by banning content that violates the TOS. And they do make editorial decisions in terms of what content they promote, and what is rewarded by monetization. And to be clear there isn't anything nefarious about this, nor does it cause these platforms to lose Section 230 protections (despite how often people claim it does).