3 ms·
I guess I'm the only one who thinks this is a dumb gimmick. There's no way this is more environmentally friendly than dim LED's on a full lifecycle carbon emiss
by istjohn 5y ago
I guess I'm the only one who thinks this is a dumb gimmick. There's no way this is more environmentally friendly than dim LED's on a full lifecycle carbon emissions per lumen-hour. One of the systems bubble oxygen. That alone probably uses more energy than an equivalently bright LED. These are not going to be very bright at all. Then you have to maintain each "bio-bulb" with nutrients which requires energy to produce and distribute. This makes no more sense than replacing street lights with glow sticks.