Maybe that's your question but people who have lost money are entitled (and should be entitled) to ask the other question and attempt to make it come to pass th

Maybe that's your question but people who have lost money are entitled (and should be entitled) to ask the other question and attempt to make it come to pass through trying to unmask the identity of the presumed anonymous actors and suing anyone who acted deceptively or negligently in the situation that led to an unexpected loss. From the little I know of this case it seems likely that this should have been governed under securities law and all participants should have been kyc'd. If that didn't happen then it looks like someone was committing securities fraud.