3 ms·
> Depends on what you mean by order i suppose. I mean, in the context of Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations [1], what sort of turbulence model [2] you a
by sampo 5y ago
> Depends on what you mean by order i suppose.
I mean, in the context of Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations [1], what sort of turbulence model [2] you are using. But apparently you are not working in this context at all, so maybe my question doesn't make sense.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reynolds-averaged_Navier%E2%80%93Stokes_equations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reynolds-averaged_Navier%E2%80...
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turbulence_modeling https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turbulence_modeling
- archermarks 5y agoAppreciate the clarification. I am familiar with RANS modeling to a reasonable extent but not with a lot of the modern developments. We're still kind of at the stage of trying to find something that works as well as Prantdl's mixing length model, or maybe a k-epsilon model. Additionally, while our processes are turbulent, the turbulence differs significantly from classical turbulence. For instance, turbulence in Hall thrusters is likely to be governed by an inverse energy cascade, where small disturbances magnify to larger and larger scales and the dissipation occurs via convection at device-scale instead of by diffusion at kolmogorov scales.