6 ms·
It is extremely funny that people are able to come to conclusions like this from just 2 data points. "Macbooks seem to be the only viable option these days", b
by gwn7 4y ago
It is extremely funny that people are able to come to conclusions like this from just 2 data points.
"Macbooks seem to be the only viable option these days", because I had bad experiences with two non-Macbook computers.
To be fair; I don't think that the author came to that conclusion only from those 2 anecdotes. But still, that is the way the argument is presented. And it really looks absurd.
- cpill 4y agoLike he said, he was unlucky. I got a Lenovo Carbon X1 and it worked with Ubuntu without problems (well, the finger print reader didn't work which become a security problem with work as we realised the weakest point was our laptops which had all the IP on them). Other than that it was a joy!
- sascha_sl 4y agoIt's just that there are endless pitfalls, especially running Linux on more recent hardware. For instance, if you would be running Kernel 5.14+ but not 5.18-rc2+, you'd be crashing every time you try to wake from suspend right now.[1] [1]: https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/dfbba2518aac4204203b0697a894d3b2f80134d3 https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/dfbba2518aac4204203...
- foepys 4y agoUsing fingerprints is insecure. Your fingerprints tend to be all over the laptop you are trying to protect and can especially be found on the fingerprint reader - unless it's one where you need to slowly move your finger across the sensor. Standardfingerprint readers are not very good at detecting fakes. A German IT magazine (c't by Heise) discovered that you can fool almost all fingerprint sensors by making the fingerprint with wood glue on a plastic strip and hold that over your own finger. It's a 15 minute job if you know what to do.
- Foivos 4y agoThese two computers are among the best windows computers though. So, you expect them to set the bar.
- gwn7 4y agoIndeed they should set the bar but it is irrelevant to my point. The point is that you can't make a generalized statement about a brand and base it only to a single anecdote about a single machine it manufactured. Mistakes and problems are everywhere. What matters is the sample size. A single anecdote can't say anything about where the bar is set. It's basic statistics.
- superasn 4y agoYes I've owned all sorts of laptops from toshiba to lenovo to asus including a macbook air and the mac was the only laptop i sold on olx as i just didn't like it one bit. So to each his own and definitely op is just unlucky and the conclusion drawn in this post is just absurd and flame-baity.
- culopatin 4y agoAnd then you get super long threads of people just sharing their opinion like it supports something. “I like Linux/Mac/Windows better”. “I don’t like my Dell”, “My Mac broke/never had an issue”. Ok what do I do with this info? Nothing, useless talk really, but we all love these threads and they always get super long
- _fat_santa 4y agoI feel like the only rational response is: "all computers have issues". When it comes to attention to detail on their machines (at least from a users perspective of interacting with one), Apple takes the crown and there's basically no one else doing it like they do. But in terms of actually being a computer? No Apple has a failure rate probably on par with the industry standard. If you don't agree with me then I would implore you to go watch some of Louis Rossmann's content on Youtube.