> It would have to accrue "Yes" votes from holders of >50% of LP tokens within a certain time period to pass. And I assume the decoy proposal was just a means

> It would have to accrue "Yes" votes from holders of >50% of LP tokens within a certain time period to pass. And I assume the decoy proposal was just a means to ensure no one realized what was going on and themselves use a flash loan to reduce the attacker's voting power below the 50% level needed to pass the proposal?